Actually these voting results pretty much comport with my expectations. I read this site because basically every other news source is worse, but I don't always agree with what Robin posts, and I disagree that the election is being stolen - which isn't to say that I disagree that the Dems are corrupt. But the demographics necessary for Trump to win simply aren't there anymore. Trump's support mostly comes from older generations and they're dying off at the moment and being replaced by immigrants. Combine that with that idiot comedian at Trump's rally and you have a recipe for a Trump loss.
I think a lot of people lean on the election stealing rhetoric because they can't cope with the idea that millions of people really are stupid enough to vote for mandatory poison vaccines and World War III. I can't say I blame them.
That's an opinion. What about the evidence everywhere? Or does the evidence have to conform to your opinions I work the other way round. I start with the evidence.
I'm open to the possibility of it being rigged, and I'm not the type to call people terrorists or election deniers or some such for alleging foul play, which is why I keep reading your blog and sites like it instead of getting my news from CNN. But I'm going with Occam's Razor, which states that the simplest answer that fits the facts is probably true. Of course it's hard to determine what's factual these days. But I just don't believe that Trump has the support to win due to demographic factors.
I don't see any major difference between the candidates anyway. Both are pro-war, pro-corporate candidates who will bring America and probably the entire world to ruin. Even if fraud is proven beyond any doubt, it's hard to get fired up about it when I know that even if Trump was able to reverse the fraud and get installed as president again, he's going to do most of the same things as Harris if not worse.
Banana Republic is us!
Actually these voting results pretty much comport with my expectations. I read this site because basically every other news source is worse, but I don't always agree with what Robin posts, and I disagree that the election is being stolen - which isn't to say that I disagree that the Dems are corrupt. But the demographics necessary for Trump to win simply aren't there anymore. Trump's support mostly comes from older generations and they're dying off at the moment and being replaced by immigrants. Combine that with that idiot comedian at Trump's rally and you have a recipe for a Trump loss.
I think a lot of people lean on the election stealing rhetoric because they can't cope with the idea that millions of people really are stupid enough to vote for mandatory poison vaccines and World War III. I can't say I blame them.
That's an opinion. What about the evidence everywhere? Or does the evidence have to conform to your opinions I work the other way round. I start with the evidence.
I'm open to the possibility of it being rigged, and I'm not the type to call people terrorists or election deniers or some such for alleging foul play, which is why I keep reading your blog and sites like it instead of getting my news from CNN. But I'm going with Occam's Razor, which states that the simplest answer that fits the facts is probably true. Of course it's hard to determine what's factual these days. But I just don't believe that Trump has the support to win due to demographic factors.
I don't see any major difference between the candidates anyway. Both are pro-war, pro-corporate candidates who will bring America and probably the entire world to ruin. Even if fraud is proven beyond any doubt, it's hard to get fired up about it when I know that even if Trump was able to reverse the fraud and get installed as president again, he's going to do most of the same things as Harris if not worse.