My main reservation about this is how anyone can say for sure what 6G is going to do when it is reported as being a decade away. A highly educated top doctor and professor at seven universities, who is a senior virologist, epidemiologist, oncologist, and immunologist, has warned that graphene oxide is present in mRNA vaccines.
The article mentions that "He has provided concrete evidence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer vaccines, among others..." Why not mention the "others"? What is holding him back? He has no problem mentioning Pfizer; why not Moderna or Novavax? The side effects of graphene oxide can be severe, so if it is present in other vaccines, why not say so? Sounds more like sensationalism to me.
Hardly 'shocking' as its old information; several biologists with sophisticated dark field electron microscopy have proven graphene for a couple of years.
Cesium 137 is also known to be in shots.
Colosal plan for survrrllance and biodigital convergence by mad scientists.
The article mentions that "He has provided concrete evidence of graphene oxide in the Pfizer vaccines, among others..." Why not mention the "others"? What is holding him back? He has no problem mentioning Pfizer; why not Moderna or Novavax? The side effects of graphene oxide can be severe, so if it is present in other vaccines, why not say so? Sounds more like sensationalism to me.
Hardly 'shocking' as its old information; several biologists with sophisticated dark field electron microscopy have proven graphene for a couple of years.
Cesium 137 is also known to be in shots.
Colosal plan for survrrllance and biodigital convergence by mad scientists.