When elected representatives can be sent to jail for representing their constituency that is DICTATORSHIP
NZDSOS say we dont live in a dictatorship, BUT....
I'm sorry but that DOES equate to a dictatorships. Everything about a democracy, including a free judiciary, a free press and public oversight have gone.
That leaves the right to vote for one side of a uniparty of your choosing.
Whangārei District Council risks jail over defying fluoridation order
Whangārei District Council risks imprisonment and fines for defying a Government fluoridation order.
The council voted to challenge the directive in the High Court, questioning fluoride’s safety and democratic process.
Mayor Vince Cocurullo emphasised the need for community input and vowed to fight for democracy.
Whangārei District Council is risking imprisonment for its politicians as it continues to defy a Government fluoridation order, lawyers have warned.
The council moved to continue its fight against fluoride at an urgent short-notice extraordinary meeting today.
The often testy, two-hour-plus meeting was called after the council received a sternly-worded letter from director general of health Dr Diana Sarfati.
In the letter, Sarfati threatened to step in with a High Court legal order enabling her to override Whangārei District Council (WDC)’s November decision not to add fluoride to the district’s drinking water.
The council must fluoridate its drinking water for 80,000 residents by March 28 or risk being charged with breaking the law.
Lawyers advising the council have warned politicians were at risk of imprisonment as a result of the council not fluoridating by then.
Other consequences included the Government sacking the council and appointing commissioners or an observer.
These are alongside the prospect of councillors being individually liable for up to $200,000 in fines for defying the fluoridation directive, plus $10,000 a day for every day after that.
Whangārei Mayor Vince Cocurullo said the council was not yet breaking any law as there was still more than a month before the directive came into force.
But Cocurullo said he would go to prison for democracy if the consequences of not meeting the March 28 decision reached that point.
He said the community needed to be able to have its say on whether fluoridation should happen and this was not the case at present.
Today’s council vote comes as ratepayers face the prospect of $5 million in potential extra WDC costs after councillors voted against fluoridating.
WDC is the only council in New Zealand refusing to fluoridate among 14 nationwide ordered to do so by outgoing director general of health Sir Ashley Bloomfield in 2022.
WDC councillor Gavin Benney led today’s council recommitment to its decision not to fluoridate, made via a 7:7 split vote where Cocurullo again used his casting vote.
Deputy Mayor Phil Halse and councillors Benney, Jayne Golightly, Marie Olsen, Simon Reid and Phoenix Ruka also voted in favour of this.
Meanwhile, councillors Nick Connop, Ken Couper, Deb Harding, Patrick Holmes, Scott McKenzie, Carol Peters and Paul Yovich were against.
The council decided to launch a High Court challenge against Sarfati’s fluoridation directive.
It will seek a declaration proceeding, which is a hearing where the court is presented with evidence on the safety or otherwise of fluoride from scientific experts and makes a judgment.
Cocurullo said the High Court should rule on the safety and science behind the Government’s fluoridation push. There was science, including from New Zealand’s government science advisers, supporting both sides of the polarised argument.
It was up to the High Court to rule on what should be used as a basis for directing New Zealand councils to fluoridate.
WDC will also seek “urgent interim relief” so it can delay its hands-on preparations for full fluoridation by the March deadline.
The council meeting saw Mayor Cocurullo eject Couper – who voted against continuing with the anti-fluoridation stance – for 10 minutes for failing to stop his line of questioning during debate. Security was called and the meeting adjourned as Couper refused to depart.
The new legal moves decided on by the council superseded its mid-December decision to apply for an injunction, after lawyers indicated this was unlikely to succeed.
They will cost WDC at least $200,000 of unbudgeted funds with increased rates, or cutting of planned council work.
Sarfati has requested a letter confirming today’s meeting decision before the end of the week.
She has signalled WDC faces a High Court legal order known as a writ of mandamus if it continues to defy her fluoridation directive.
Cocurullo said WDC’s resistance was for two reasons. The first was questioning the safety of fluoride.
The second was about democracy, where one person could order a council to fluoridate without asking the public for its thoughts.
Discover more
Councillor Deb Harding pushed for greater community say in the decision via councillors supporting New Zealand First’s Fluoridation (Referendum) Legislation Bill, which seeks to repeal the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 that grants centralised authority to the director general of health and mandates the fluoridation of local water supplies.
The bill would also amend the Local Government Act 2002 and Health Act 1956 mandating local authorities to hold a binding referendum on water fluoridation.
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said the bill reinstated communities’ fundamental right to determine through democracy whether or not their water supply was fluoridated.
“Important public health measures such as this should be decided with transparency, debate, and local voices, not by overreaching Wellington-based bureaucrats,” Peters said.
This is perception only
When you have the Uniparty as we do in the american empire and corporations get rights like they are citizens you can kiss any real democracy goodby...
Flouride by the way is toxic so you gotta ask WHY are the elites dumping it in your drinking water...?