Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Al-Andalus Tribune's avatar

Israel is the world champ at false flags, but this shooting comes with a brilliant, heartfelt manifesto that huge numbers of people agree with, which pretty much seals the deal that it's real. https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-israel-embassy-shooter-manifesto/

9/11 Revisionist's avatar

No one believing Christopher Bollyn’s presentations about ‘Solving 9/11” notices that nowhere does he mention David Rockefeller as a suspect of the 9/11 crime, or does he point a serious finger at SAIC and ARA and the 21 other NIST subcontractors.

Read more: https://911revision.substack.com/p/deps-the-directed-energy-professional

You cannot disregard that A LOT of people knew that something was going to happen that day, as a lot of researchers have gone into depth on the insider trading, people not going to work the day, the war games and so much more bluff around WHAT happened to the Towers.

Video clip: https://rumble.com/v6zumz8-insider-trading-prior-to-911.html

I would argue that Bollyn takes the attention away from the NIST subcontractors and the technology used on 9/11, that can free us from this false scarcity world we live in.

After all, Bollyn was the first first person to actually connect 9/11 to DEW in February 14, 2002.

Read Bollyn's paper: https://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn1.htm

As per usual, note the emphasis on the disinfo ‘high heat”, ‘lasers”, ‘vaporization”, ‘dust is only from concrete”, and of course ‘Jewish space laser” etc.

This was before David Icke’s book, which was published on October 11, 2002 and there is important background info you need to know about David Icke’s 9/11 disinformation.

Read more here: https://911revision.substack.com/p/david-icke-on-911

Stay asleep, this shit doesn’t exist.

9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Lenin

Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-truth-suppression-timeline

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?