As bombshell information comes out about the dangers of fluoride for childrens' brains the NZ government seeks to punish Council for not fluoridating water
While this is coming out internationally THIS is what is happening in New Zealand
TAURANGA TO BE PUNISHED FOR CHALLENGING FLUORIDE DIRECTIVE
From NZ Herald:
Tauranga’s council faces “extreme” costs that could run into millions of dollars if it does not fluoridate the city’s water by the end of next month after being refused an extension.
At a tense meeting in August, Tauranga City Council decided to ask the Ministry of Health for an extension to the November 30 deadline to fluoridate the water. It must start dosing 30 days prior to comply.
The city’s water has been un-fluoridated since 1992.
The extension would allow time for a judicial review of the fluoridation directive to be completed in 2025.
Mayor Mahé Drysdale said elected members wanted the matters before the High Court finalised before fluoridation happened.
The council acknowledged the ministry was able to mandate water fluoridation, but the review was an important opportunity to allow court processes to run their course and provide direction for water consumers and water supply authorities, Drysdale said.
The judicial review followed New Health New Zealand Inc’s legal challenge of the director general of health’s fluoride directive.
The director-general of health has directed 14 councils to fluoridate their city’s water supply.
In November 2023, a High Court judgment questioned whether the direction to fluoridate water considered the Bill of Rights. The director general of health’s analysis of this is ongoing.
The director-general of health and the attorney general have appealed the decision, which is scheduled to be heard in June 2025.
In a letter to Tauranga City Council received on September 20, director-general of health, Dr Diana Sarfati, turned down the request and repeated earlier advice that councils subject to a fluoridation direction must comply or face significant financial penalties.
If the council doesn’t comply with the order, it faces a potential fine of up to $200,000 and, if the non-compliance continues, it could be fined up to $10,000 a day
https://t.me/seemorerocks/75393
Here is the Daily Mail article
Bombshell fluoride ruling as judge says US drinking water poses 'hazard' to children's brains
Fluoride in US drinking water poses an 'unreasonable risk' to children's brains, according to a federal judge who has asked the Government to step in.
Judge Edward Chen in San Francisco has called on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to further regulate the fluoride in tap water because of growing evidence it lowers the IQ of minors.
He didn’t say what measures should be taken, but a spokesman for the EPA told DailyMail.com that they were now reviewing the decision.
In his ruling, Chen said: 'The scientific literature in the record provides a high level of certainty that a hazard is present; fluoride is associated with reduced IQ.'
The issue around fluoride in tap water is controversial because its introduction is considered one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century due to its effectiveness in reducing tooth decay in children.
The above map shows estimated fluoride concentrations in community water systems between 2006 and 2011. It was published in 2023. Counties that are colored red have more than double the recommended level of fluoride in their water
The court did not conclude with certainty that fluoride does damage children's brains, but said that it posed an 'unreasonable risk' which the EPA should investigate.
More than 200million Americans drink water that contains fluoride, or 75 percent of the population, more than in any other country in the world.
The mineral was added in the 1970s after studies showed it could prevent cavities, with the CDC now estimating it saves $6.5billion every year in dental costs.
Fluoride in the water linked to anxiety, headaches and temper problems in children as young as three, study shows
But a landmark Government report published last month also warned that the mineral could harm children's IQ in high concentrations.
It said that this could happen when fluoride levels were above 1.5 mg/L, with hundreds of thousands of American children thought to be exposed to these levels in areas of Texas, Illinois and New Mexico among others.
Results linked the highest levels with a five point drop.
The ruling was made in the US District Court for the Northern District of California on Tuesday.
Michael Connett, the lawyer for the advocacy groups that asked the courts to review the new report on fluoride, said in a statement Wednesday: 'The court’s historic decision should help pave the way towards better and safer fluoride standards for all.'
A spokesperson for the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) added: 'History has been made.
'After seven years of pursuing legal action against the EPA over the risk posed to developing brains by the practice of water fluoridation, the [court] has just ruled on behalf of FAN and the plaintiffs in a precedent-setting court case.'
The EPA currently says fluoride levels should not be above 4 mg/L in order to avoid skeletal fluorosis, a potentially crippling disorder causing weaker bones.
But in 2006, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, the federal Government's primary scientific advisory institute, recommended that the EPA lower its limit in order to protect children.
The World Health Organization says the safe limit is about 1.5 mg/L.
And the Government report published last month found that when fluoride levels are above 1.5 mg/L this can cause damage to children's IQ.
For comparison, in the US most areas currently fluoridate their water supply at about 0.7 mg/L.
This is well above the safe limit for pregnant women suggested by some studies of about 0.4 mg/L. Bottled water often does not contain fluoride.
The court case was brought by Food and Water Watch and FAN among other groups after the EPA denied a petition to outlaw the 75-year-old practice of adding fluoride to drinking water to prevent cavities.
Dentists, water utilities and chemical policy attorneys are among the groups that have tracked the case.
And to think I ever thought after meeting Edmund Hillary and Dave Hahn I was enthralled with maybe even moving there. Not any more, not even for a vacation. Kiwis need to revolt. Dump the Commonwealth. Ditch the ANZAC. BAN ALL GLOBAL MISLEADERS FROM EVER SETTING FOOT BACK IN THE NATION. THAT MEANS YOU Jacinda!
if memory serves it was stalin who first noted the value of fluoridating water in respect of reducing the number of guards required to manage gulags...
The information as covered by the article here illustrates a sublime example of the "mask slipping" whereas they still try to maintain ambivolence and suggest that the "science is as yet un-decided" in respect of the "vaccines"... (despite Us knowing they are deadly).
Here however We have a point blank, gun in yer face, bare faced LIE.
Despite these findings NZ and in my knowledge UK will still push for this poison to be fed to You and Your Kids.... My own "dentist" stares at me glassily as she fails to compute (every time) when she routinely enquires that i am using "a fluoride toothpaste" and receives the answer "never"...
Any that have experienced the mindset of the "health practitioners" know the kind of mindnumbing pressure they are given during "tuition" a practice and method that would be immediately outlawed if ever viewed in its correct context..
The concept that a minority should have authority over the many is described in varying ways, socialsm, communism and a whole raft of new variables that attempt to sugar coat something that is literally "alien" to healthy human culture..
And therein lies the rub, those pulling the strings, working the cogs, firing the furnaces, put simply they are not like You and me..
The assumption that just because it looks like a human therefore it is a human will not serve You well in this current time, But if You listen carefully to the under current You will hear the first vague whispers that a "certain group" are set to reveal themselves..
The timing will be crucial, "humanity" will have to be up to its big kahuna burgers in liquid diahorrea and flailing wildly before such an audacious move can be made..
Are You equipped to deal with this, emotionally, mentally, physically even?
If You made it this far then the answer is, Absolutely